Bargaining in Kowloon

tazaAll my shopping has already been done in Kowloon.
For those of you who don’t know, Kowloon is one of the most popular shopping districts in Hong Kong and, though you can find there pretty almost anything, it’s mostly famous for mobile electronics and cameras (used or brand new), and for a large street market with clothing, houseware, complements and whatnot.
Now, I pride myself of being a merciless bargainer, but, no matter how tough I haggle over a given item with those street sellers, once we make a deal I can’t help the feeling of having been ripped off. As a matter of ract, it wouldn’t be the first time that, after bargaining a good price for something, a few barrows further I find that very same something for sale at a “start price” 10% lower than what I finally paid for it…
So, if you ever go shopping in Kowloon, follow my advice: be worse than merciless: be ruthless!

Beauty without brains…

…is good for nothing.
Indeed.

Rocks Hotel staircase
Rocks Hotel staircase

So, this was the palce: Rocks Hotel; not the most luxurious one in Macao, but the most expensive I had been so far. A restored building from colonial times, when Portugal was in full bloom. An unbeatable location right by the shore, with a splendid view to the sea under the 3 km long Amizade bridge. Wallpapered room, wooden floor, marbled bathroom, king size bed, hi-fi stereo, massive wood furniture, XIXth century style bathtub, copper pipework, classical shutters, wooden balustrade in the balcony, embroidered bathrobes and towels, towel slippers, full perfumery and toilet equipement, cable network and TV, flat 42″ screen, all kinds of gadgets… you name it! Downstairs, a vast marble hall and staircase, armor platings adorning the corners, chrystal chandeliers hanging down the high ceilings, greenhouse skylight, tapestries on the walls, mirror-polished brass doors, gym, huge floorboard terrace, private garden, all elegance and whatnot… Besides, supper and breakfast included, excellent quality food, and great variety. Well, I hope you get the picture, don’t you?
But then, upon checking in, the first check: 1000 HKD key deposit. What?? That’s 100 €! Are those card-keys really worth that money? That’s more than half the price of the room itself. More yet: is it any classy for a top notch hotel to ask for a key deposit, in the first place? Sounds more like a second rated youth hostel in London’s Soho…
I tell the bloke at the reception: “look, that’s about as much as we’re going to spend in the whole afternoon; you don’t expect us to exchange currency just for paying that absurd deposit, do you?” He replies: “I’m very sorry, sir, but…” My girlfriend puts a 500 HKD banknote on the desk and the other receptionist, a young lady fortunately not so much square headed, takes it and says: “It’s ok, mister, we can make it 500”. So, they issue a receipt and Willow, my girl, signs it and keeps it.
Ours was just a one day trip. The next morning Willow has to wake up early for going to work, back in China, while I stay loafing about in bed, stretching my limbs, taking a shower, then having a slow, delicious and reinvigorating late breakfast. My own ferry leaves at noon, so I check out at 11 a.m. The same pair as the day before tend the reception. Upon handling them the receipt, the guy comes: “excuse me, mister: we can’t refund the deposit to you; it’s your wife who signed the receipt”.
I pride myself of being an experienced traveler, but such a piece of nonsense I had never heard before, nor could I have even fantasized. Needless to say, it took me aback, and for a moment I didn’t know how to react. Finally I found my voice back:
— Well, but my wife has left early this morning, and as I was staying a few hours longer, she couldn’t return the keys, least I wouldn’t be able to leave the room at ease.
— Then, sir, I’m very much afraid we can’t proceed. Maybe you can tell her to come back?
I couldn’t believe what I was hearing.
— What the heck are you saying? Hello! My wife is now in China; she can’t just come back like if she had gone to buy the paper.
— But that’s no problem, mister! She has two months for retrieving the money and…
— Look, are you kidding me? It takes two hours to come here by ferry and another two hours back, plusthe ferry costs 400 HKD. Do you mean we have to spend 400 for recovering our 500?
— In such case, sir, there’s nothing we can do…
— All right, then. I want to talk to the manager.
— Oh, we’re sorry! The manager is not here now.
It was desperating. I tried once more: “Listen: don’t be so square headed; we were together in the room, she’s already gone and now it’s only me to sign that paper; so, please call the manager or whomever you need to talk to, because otherwise it’s me who’s going to call the police, the consulate, or I don’t know whom. But I need to take a ferry at noon and I’m not going to leave without my money; is this clear?” Of course those words were but a bluff: there’s no Spanish consulate in Macao, and, had there been, calling them, or the police, would be utterly useless; plus, I’d definitely lose my ferry ticket. But the bluff must have worked somewhat, because, as the guy was shrugging, the girl asked me: “can you please give us her phone, so we can talk to her?”
I gave them Willow’s number, and the receptionist talked to her over the phone. After a one minute conversation, she finally gave in: “ok, no problem; you can sign the receipt and we’ll refund you the money; but we need to take down your passport’s data”.
With all my blessings I handled them my passport. And this is how I managed to recover the money; but that episode and those receptionists will be indelibly recorded in my memory as the most nonsensical, rigid and absurd I’d ever have to deal with.
Now, if I could talk to the hotel’s manager, I’d ask him: is it really worth to lose two customers and all the prestige for the sake of idiotic rules, or for saving some money in full-brain employees? As the famous advertising goes: “Beauty without brains is good for nothing.”

Bye-bye to Skype & Whatsapp: welcome Viber

viberSince lethal Microsoft purchased and took over Skype, the product started declining. That’s an undeniable fact. I still remember the Skype malfunctions and constant freezes with a shiver, right after being bought by Gates Allmighty and for a period of months. More recently, Skype’s smartphone apps leaved much to be desired, at least for Symbian and -quite ironically- for Windows Phone. The fact that the same company who ownes Skype provides the worst Skype app for their phones is not only pure irony: it’s a blatant mockery to the consumer. In effect, with the Skype for WP8 app you can’t send SMS.
As to Whatsapp… not that I have anything against it. Quite on the contrary, it has been a faithful app, always working as expected, 100% reliable and, well, virtually free. Besides, the fact that pretty almost everyone has Whatsapp in their smartphones seems to make it an irreplaceable app. But nothing lasts forever in the speedlight developing world of computing, and a new app can grow while an old one disappears. And, in my opinion, the purchase of Whatsapp by Facebook will be the start of its decline. Many people don’t like their personal information, contact lists, etc, being traded with and, most of all, being crossed over other databases for the monopoly of a given business. And, on the other hand, where’s the point in having two different applications when you can have just one which offers the features of both?
That’s why I welcome Viber: in the smartphone area, and except for sending SMS, Viber can do all what Skype and Whatsapp do together: this long existing and -probably for lack of a proper comercialization- generally obliterated little app can send and receive text messages and photos in exactly the same way as Whatsapp (i.e., with the “double check” system), and it can also place phonecalls to another Viber numbers, and to non-Viber numbers if you buy credit, exactly as Skype can do -and for cheaper fees, by the way. Sure: Whatsapp has promised us to implement voice calls, but Viber has simply taken over the lead from Whatsapp. Therefore, as of today, April 2014, Viber is more functional and totally free. As to Skype, I’m afraid they’re slowly lagging behind those two, at least in the world of smartphones; but not only, because Viber for the main computer OSes is also available (I haven’t tasted it yet, though).
So, it seems that we have an unexpected new player in this game; or, rather, an old player on steroids, ready to kick out his contenders. Personally, I’ve already happily removed the Skype app from all my smartphones, which I was looking forward long ago, and if I still keep Whatsapp that’s for “backwards compatibility”, until my contacts migrate slowly (this will take quite a while, though; I acknowledge). In my computer, however, I still can’t do without Skype, because every now and then I need to send SMS to abroad, and I can’t replace that Skype’s feature with another program’s… that I know of.
.viberSince lethal Microsoft purchased and took over Skype, the product started declining. That’s an undeniable fact. I still remember the Skype malfunctions and constant freezes with a shiver, right after being bought by Gates Allmighty and for a period of months. More recently, Skype’s smartphone apps leaved much to be desired, at least for Symbian and -quite ironically- for Windows Phone. The fact that the same company who ownes Skype provides the worst Skype app for their phones is not only pure irony: it’s a blatant mockery to the consumer. In effect, with the Skype for WP8 app you can’t send SMS. As to Whatsapp… not that I have anything against it. Quite on the contrary, it has been a faithful app, always working as expected, 100% reliable and, well, virtually free. Besides, the fact that pretty almost everyone has Whatsapp in their smartphones seems to make it an irreplaceable app. But nothing lasts forever in the speedlight developing world of computing, and a new app can grow while an old one disappears. And, in my opinion, the purchase of Whatsapp by Facebook will be the start of its decline. Many people don’t like their personal information, contact lists, etc, being traded with and, most of all, being crossed over other databases for the monopoly of a given business. And, on the other hand, where’s the point in having two different applications when you can have just one which offers the features of both? That’s why I welcome Viber: in the smartphone area, and except for sending SMS, Viber can do all what Skype and Whatsapp do together: this long existing and -probably for lack of a proper comercialization- generally obliterated little app can send and receive text messages and photos in exactly the same way as Whatsapp (i.e., with the “double check” system), and it can also place phonecalls to another Viber numbers, and to non-Viber numbers if you buy credit, exactly as Skype can do -and for cheaper fees, by the way. Sure: Whatsapp has promised us to implement voice calls, but Viber has simply taken over the lead from Whatsapp. Therefore, as of today, April 2014, Viber is more functional and totally free. As to Skype, I’m afraid they’re slowly lagging behind those two, at least in the world of smartphones; but not only, because Viber for the main computer OSes is also available (I haven’t tasted it yet, though). So, it seems that we have an unexpected new player in this game; or, rather, an old player on steroids, ready to kick out his contenders. Personally, I’ve already happily removed the Skype app from all my smartphones, which I was looking forward long ago, and if I still keep Whatsapp that’s for “backwards compatibility”, until my contacts migrate slowly (this will take quite a while, though; I acknowledge). In my computer, however, I still can’t do without Skype, because every now and then I need to send SMS to abroad, and I can’t replace that Skype’s feature with another program’s… that I know of.

Western Union: fraud practices

wuxIf you’re thinking on using Western Union for sending money, BEWARE! It may well turn into a very frustrating and outrageous trap. Actually, a sharply deviced swindle.
Say, for instance, you want to send 300 $ to Someone, who lives Countryland. You go to Western Union website and click on the “send money online” link. You find Countryland under the “country” select box and you place your order for the “money in minutes” service. You fill the form with your credit/debit card numbers and submit the information. Here’s where the fun starts.
First and foremost of anything else, W.U. charges your card for the sent amount (300 $) plus the service fee; and only then, in the second place, they do some TOP SECRET verifications… after which they come up with a funny message like: Your transfer was not authorized, and then they suggest you to try and send your money again. Don’t do it!: They’ll sure charge your card again, but the transfer will fail again.
As no information is provided to the customer-victim about why the transfer was unauthorized, I called their support number, only to hear from the employee that: we’re sorry, but we don’t provide the ‘money in minutes’ service for Countryland. But then, if their web tool lets you place an order for a service they don’t provide, this is called robbery. Western Union should absolutely make the ‘money in minutes’ option unavailable for the countries where such service is not provided; instead, they inform you only AFTER they charge your card (and only if you call their support service). But charging your card is the only thing they want, as you’ll see if you keep reading.
So, I asked the support guy: “Then, how can I send money to my friend Someone, who lives in Countryland?” You can make a Western Union transfer online to his bank account, he replies. “Are you sure it will work?” Totally sure, sir; a transfer to a bank account will be authorized. “And what happens to the charge you’ve already made to my card?” Oh, don’t worry, sir: you’ll get a full refund after 3-5 labour days.
Hence, the ingenous customer-victim repeats the process, except this time you pick the “transfer to a bank account” option. And what happens? Western Union charges again your card and they take you again to the “unauthorized transfer” situation, suggesting you once more to try to send the money for a third time.
Now is when you start feeling like killing someone. You call their customer support for a second time, you complain and ask them why the transfer was not authorized this time, but now they’ll give you the most insulting reply ever inventedSorry, sir, but for security reasons we can’t ‘divulge’ this information. What the hell?! You’re not asking them to “divulge” anything. You just want to know why your  card has been charged 600+ $ and Western Union is not going to send a single cent to the addressee. But if you insist in your query, the employee will start acting like an automat, and keep repeating the same sentence over and over: for security reasons we can’t divulge this information; and you give up, realizing there’s no point in talking to a robot.
No information at all will ever be provided to you about the reasons why they didn’t authorize the transfer; and what’s yet more important, they’ll never explain why they verify-unauthorize the transfer AFTER charging your card, instead of BEFORE. Why on earth don’t they check whatever they need to chek prior to charging your card, instead of afterwards? I can’t even fantasize a reason for not performing their damned Top Secret security verifications in advance. But, as you’ll read soon,  here is precisely where their scam lies.
After this happened to me, I posted a complain in Western Union’s Facebook wall. Their community manager answered promptly to my post, but this answer was as unhelpful as it was polite. Along the thread that followed, I asked them up to three times to provide a sensible, not intelligence-offensive reason why they don’t make their verifications BEFORE charging the victims’ cards? But, for three times, they totally ignored my question, as if I didn’t write it. Soon afterwards, they erased the whole thread, for nobody to ever be able read it.
I also emailed them with three quests:
Q 1: Why are those transfers unauthorized?
A 1: For security reasons, blah, blah, blah…
Q 2: Why don’t you verify before taking the customers’ money? No reply. Question ignored.
Q 3: When will my funds be released?
A 3: Oh!, ask your card issuer. You should get a full refund in ten labour days.
One month after  charging 600 $ from my card, Western Union has neither done the transfer nor returned the money.
This is how the fraud works: Western Union charges the victim’s card, then “unauthorizes” the transfer. Your card’s bank issuer holds your money for as long as they want, thus getting maybe a few millions’ free credit, and Western Union gets a commission for doing this “little favour” to the banks. (Just think: they may unauthorize thousands of transfers worldwide every day, which may mean a few million US$ free credit.)
Besides, when you ask Western Union about your refund, they forward you to your card’s issuer bank, thus dodging the problem: it’s not a contract between the customer and the bank; it’s a contract between the customer and Western Union. This company is the one charging your card, therefore they’re legally liable to have you get the money back inmediately after they unauthorize the operation (for reasons they only know and won’t even tell you).
And here’s how finally Western Union ices the cake: Once you realize this blatant fraud, you may think of denouncing or suing them. But when you try to find out who they actually are, and where’s their head office, it turns out they’re at PO Box 7850, Athens, Greece.
Greece! Western Union has its head office in Greece! No way taking any legal actions against them in Greece. The customer-victim is utterly helpless.
Such is Western Union: a dishonest company. A fraud. An unpunisable rip-off.

Lumia 925 & Windows Phone 8. Independent review

lumia925
Microsoft (aka Nokia) Lumia 925

Apology: as Microsoft owns both Nokia devices and Windows Phone 8 operating system, there’s often no way for me to tell where a given problem lies, whether in the hardware or in the software. So, I apologize in advance if I make mistakes when blaming one or the other for some of the many issues this couplet has. Actually, by the time I wrote this review I was new to Windows Phone, an OS I had never been curious about, and I would’ve never gone for it if it weren’t because Nokia was, by then, the only brand providing the most valuable feature I ask of a cellular: free offline maps (HERE maps).
For the tests I’m subjecting the Lumia to in this review, I’m using two other devices as a reference: a Nokia C7 (Symbian Belle) and a LG Optimus Black (Android).
Look and feel
I won’t digress much in this section. Physically, the Lumia 925 is one of the sexiest handsets I’ve ever beheld; a pleasure to hold, and slim as can be, feeling very light while not fragile (regrettably too prone to slip off your grasp) and featuring a fine form factor, though a bit too wide for single-handed use unless you’ve really long fingers. Its design is simple and elegant: an aluminum frame holding together the display and the plastic back cover (pity it’s not also aluminum, but it pays off for the sake of lightness). The three discrete physical buttons are placed on the right side, and hence the first flaw I find about it: the volume rocker. Nokia should learn something from other brands and start placing the volume keys on the left, which is more handy and allows for a firmer grasp. Right below the display sit the three haptic (and awkward) buttons that Microsoft imposes on Windows Phone handsets. On the back there is the mandatory camera lense, a very good quality Carl Zeiss, the flash leds and the loudspeaker.
Usability. The Windows Phone OS.
Very regrettably, Windows Phone is just about restrictions. I’ve never seen such a fine hardware spoiled by such a dreadful software. WP8 is totally unworthy of this device, and definitely wastes its capabilities. There are so many glitches, setbacks and restrictions in WP8 that I’m at a loss about where to start.
Perhaps the first thing I noticed is that waking up the phone needs two steps, instead of just one like most other phones. Even without a screen lock, you need to: 1st, push the power (or double-tap the display) for getting past the standby screen (called glance, something nice and useful); 2nd, slide up the lock screen; only then you’re presented with the tiled Win_8/ WP8 iconic home screen (and it’s pretty obvious where Bill Gates wants to lead us: to purchase both his computer OS and his smartphone OS.) Some might consider this two-stepped wake up a feature, as it’s less prone to accidentally waking up the phone, but for me it’s an extra hassle.
Application list layout
Tapping on the central haptic button always shows the only one home screen, where you can pin, in a vertically scrollable matrix, your favourite apps’ tiles (each providing three optional sizes for different levels of ‘live’ information); and sliding the home screen to the left takes us to the very unwieldy applications screen: a one-colum, big-font-sized list of all installed apps, in alphabetical order, seemingly designed for the inexcusable purposes of wasting display room and–lacking a scrollbar– turning app search into a slow task.  As you can see, barely seven apps fit in a screen when other OS’s would fit twenty. Fortunately you can get a screen with alphabet shortcuts just by pressing on any letter in the list, which is something nice and handy. But there was no need to reinvent the wheel.
Search 'feature'
The right haptic button is one of WP8’s most inconvenient features, imho: not only it stands always in the middle of every thumb movement you make, thus often being hit by accident, but also serves to the main purpose of marketing Microsoft’s Bing search engine: it brings forward a browser featured with two icons for music recognizing and QR code scanning. Unfortunately you can’t remap the haptic buttons, nor disable any of them. This is obviously made on purpose, which I find to be almost a swindle: a total waste of a precious haptic button blatantly serving Microsoft’s own profit instead of the buyer’s use.
Finally the left haptic button, return, despite being the most used is the hardest to tap: most people will need to use two hands for that; and if you try to reach it with your right thumb single-handedly… you’ll just accidentally hit search once more and help promote Bing (very cunningly thought, Microsoft). For the rest, return works very much like a browser’s left arrow: it takes us to wherever we were before, and it’s often the only way for collapsing the popup keyboard.
Another down side, to me, about WP8 OS is the development and use restrictions severely imposed on the user, most of all when it comes to filesystem access, which is close to null. Microsoft is paranoid about this. There’s almost no way of file exploring except for a few standard MTP-accessible folders (photos, downloads, videos, etc). This is a big con for anyone willing to have a decent control over which files he’s storing in his device, and takes up a lot of the Lumia 925’s very scant storage room, as you can’t perform any kind of thorough filesystem cleaning task. This leads to a ceaseless increase of garbage files you can’t get rid of, and quickly shrinks the scarce storage. In my unit, after just one month of use, the so called other (aka dump) category in the filesystem rounded up to 800 MB. After one year, there is 1.6 GB of other stuff which you can never get rid of. There are a couple apps in the App store to help delete this garbage, but I haven’t succeeded with any of them.
Settings layout Another one annoying thing about WP8 is the settings layout: instead of a hierarchy with ten or fifteen main categories holding subcategories, you get a scroll list with 54 items (!!), divided in two groups: system and applications, and sorted out without any criteria whatsoever, logical, alphabetical or human-understandable. For finding a given setting, you need to slowly scroll through the whole list, which happens to be extremely inconvenient and cumbersome.
For instance, under system there is a setting named Storage check and another one called Phone storage. Or for example Wallet, Phone or Background tasks are counterintuitively listed under applications. Inversely, Email+accounts, Internet sharing, Kids corner or even Company apps, don’t go under applicatoins, but under system. Sorry, Microsoft, WTF?
WP8's keypad
What else? There is no single press to the dial pad, like every other phone on the planet has. On WP8 you need at least two keypresses: first hit the phone tile, then the keypad option. Worse yet: the T9 keypad lacks a keyboard feature; I mean, you can’t type letters with the T9, despite they’re shown under the numbers; but they’re merely ornamental. So, no contacts finding and filtering. There is a free app in the store (Phone dialer) that can do this, but then you always need to confirm the call, as WP8 restricts call access to apps. (Thanks to DreamTeam Mobile for thieir app.)
Another one of the most arguable points in WP8: no app nor shortcut is allowed to change settings. They’re only allowed to provide a link to some setting; therefore you always need at least two taps where other OSes need just one. Some say this is on account of the (shooing and always vague) safety reasons; but until someone tells me a real solid argument to buy those reasons, I’ll keep thinking it’s but Microsoft’s unnecessary restrictions.
No notifications when in eco-mode
Except for calls and SMSs, there are no background notifications when in Battery saver mode, which is close to unacceptable for IM apps (Viber, Telegram, etc). There is an exceptions list where you can place the apps you don’t want to be affected by Battery saver mode, but it doesn’t work: apps never get to know they’re in the whitelist. This means you can’t stay socially connected and preserve power, which is an extraordinary inconsistence: if you want to get notified of instant messages you have to turn Battery saver mode off, your battery will drain quickly and you won’t get IMs any more; but if you preserve your battery, then you don’t get IM’s either.
Keyboard in predictive text mode takes 80% screen.
As to the virtual keyboard, I’ve never had to deal with anything this bad. Drawn in the maximal-minimalistic kind of style with which Microsft wants to reinvent the hot water, WP8’s oversized and simplistic keyboard is both unpractical for typing on, and obstructing with the app running behind. Some of its main issues are:
Lacks one-tap basic signs (a question mark, for instance), and overall signs and symbols are bothersome to find, and time-consuming.
Lower row misplaced to the right. Specially in the Spanish layout, letters in the lower row are oddly (and annoyingly) placed: keys to be pressed with the left thumb are noticeably closer to the right one.
Too wide suggestions’ stripe in predictive text mode, leaving barely one fourth of the screen to the app behind.
Virtual keyboards for smartphones have already been brought to perfection by iOS and Android designers, and hardly anything else can be done to make them any better; therefore, any step in the line of bringing to humankind a new way of typing is plain pretentious. The wheel can not be reinvented, Microsoft: WP8’s keyboard does not contribute with anything to the typing experience, while certainly detracts usability.
And to crown it all, you can’t add dirty words to the dictionary. Actually, there is a bug with the dictionary that makes it to suddenly stop accepting new words, until you reset it (thus losing all previously added ones).
One good thing can be said about this keyboard, though: predictive text works like a charm. Most of the time it gives me just about the right suggestion. Better than Android for sure.
To finish this section, just a word about the Skype app: you can’t send SMS with it. Funny enough, Skype belongs to Microsoft.
Usability. The device.
One of the brightest sides of this handset is the display. Simply superb: resolution, color density, responsiveness, brightness, reflections… you name it. All aspects of the screen are great, the best I’ve had, which is a lot to say.
Other strong point in the Lumia 925 is the camera, which is extremely good for a mobile. Sometimes it takes pictures as good as with my Nikon Coolpix. The Karl Zeiss lens, along with Lumia’s five photo applications, let you profit its possibilities to the max. However, I don’t quite see the point in Nokia offering four different camera applicationss (besides the WP8 default), because they’re redundant and confusing. I wish there was just one app, offering all the features together, because most of the times I lose good shots only thinking which of the five apps should I use.
Call quality is acceptably good. Voice through the earpiece sounds clean, undistorted and crisp.
But that’s as good as it gets, because the Lumia 925 has an awful 2G data transmission. Whatever its cause–hardware or software–sometimes it can’t establish a 2G connection even when in good signal (2-3 bars): in exactly in the same spot where both my Nokia C7 and my LG Optimus Black need only ten seconds to sync mail or chats, the Lumia can take up to three minutes to connect, only to  give up unsucceded. No problem with 3G, however, but very often 2G is just more convenient, and at times the only signal available.  In this regard, the Lumia scores an absolute zero. They’ve done a very poor job here for an alleged flagship phone: it oughtn’t have any problems with data over GPRS where an outdated Android Froyo or a relegated Symbian Belle do the job flawlessly.
Another one big flaw is the too little storage: it’s RAM is exactly 16,000,000 bytes big, which is only 15.2 GB instead of 16 GB as the marketing goes. At the very essential, this RAM has to contain the OS itself, which is around 2,6 GB (!!), plus the apps, plus some maps and quite a few shots (that’s why you buy this device: offline maps and the Karl Zeiss), plus the darned ‘other’ folder 1.6 GB large. This means, practically you have around 5 GB of real storage left, definitely too little for your multimedia content. As I don’t see any good reason for not shipping a 32 GB chip, or at least a microSD expansion slot(!), I firmly believe that this is done deliberately to force you to use OneDrive, the cloud. Bill Gates doesn’t want you to store locally, but on his servers, wherefrom his crue can collect data and statistics to be sold to the best bidder; then he boasts he helps the poor children in Africa: yes, he does so with the money he makes selling your privacy.
As to battery life, it’s quite poor; fully disappointing when it comes to practical use. With normal-to-intensive use I need to charge the phone twice a day. Sure, if you put the handset to sleep in eco-mode mode, battery can last well over ten days; but nobody buys this phone for not using it. Or if you only use it for calls over 2G, battery life is still quite acceptable: three or four days without a recharge; but then again, you don’t spend 350 € in a piece of hardware like this for just that. A Lumia 925 buyer looks for much more: you want to chat, navigate, use VOIP, videoconference, listen to music, play videos, take photos, check email, use maps, etc. But if you do this, then a fully charged battery won’t make it till the end of the day. See this screenshot here:
Battery drain
The steep dive between 4 and 6 pm happened with two hours of Viber chat, which drained around 45% of the power. Extrapolating this, then four hours of IM-ing will give you a dead phone (supposing it was fully charged). Actually when IM-ing the processor gets so hot you can frie an egg on it. And it doesn’t depend on your favourite IM app; it happens with all the most popular (Whatsapp, Viber, Skype, Telegram). Comparatively, think that on my Nokia C7 Belle I can chat thrice that time until I run out of power, having a much smaller battery.

* * *

And that’s all so far. I’ve left behind in this review some typical aspects like multimedia capabilities, camera details, web browsing experience or extended information about calls. It’s not an overlook, but there are dozens of professional reviews out there that will give you extense and, as far as I’ve read, quite reliable information regarding those features. My main point here was to talk about those sides proffesional reviewers never mention.
Epilogue
I can’t really see what kind of customers is Microsoft targetting with WP8. Buying a smartphone for getting mostly restrictions and for losing features seems to me absurd. Perhaps it’s a matter of fashion, but I don’t get it. Actually, many WP8 buyers comment online that they were just bored of Android and wanted to try something different. Well, I reckon you need to be ample on money for that. From my point of view, the only one good reason for purchasing a Microsoft Nokia used to be HERE maps. But now you can have that in Android as well, so, what gives? True, some things are really cool about the 925: Glance is cool; the stability of WP8 is cool (yet, sometimes it freezes), but at the cost of restrictions.